In brief
Two identical twins are on trial in France for their alleged involvement in a double murder, creating a complicated legal scenario due to their identical DNA. Both 33-year-old brothers are accused of conspiring to commit the murders, but forensic tests have made it impossible to determine which twin fired the weapon used. The trial seeks to address the unique challenges posed by their identical genetic profiles while investigating their intertwined activities leading up to the crime.
Two identical twins on trial for murder in France have confounded attempts to determine which one pulled the trigger because they have the same DNA, French media report.
The 33-year-old brothers are among five defendants on trial near Paris, accused of a double murder and several subsequent attempted killings in 2020, according to reputable French newspaper Le Parisien.
It reports that both are suspected of conspiring to plot the double murder, but that DNA on an assault rifle used in one of the later gun battles could only be from one twin.
A police officer told the court that forensic experts were unable to tell which of the brothers had been conclusively implicated.
Only their mother can tell them apart, one investigator is quoted as telling the court in Bobigny, north of the French capital.
There is reportedly a tense atmosphere in the court where the trial is taking place. On Tuesday, both twins were said to have been expelled from the courtroom for refusing to stand up.
Police believe they have taken advantage of their resemblance to cover their tracks. A senior officer quoted by Le Parisien said the pair frequently exchanged clothes, phones and identification documents.
Identical twins develop from a single fertilised egg that splits during pregnancy. Because they originate from the same egg and sperm, they share exactly the same DNA, making forensic identification extremely difficult.
With genetic data unable to distinguish between them, investigators relied on phone records, surveillance footage, wiretaps and efforts to corroborate their whereabouts and movements, according to Le Parisien.
But the crucial question of who fired the recovered weapon remains an open one.
The trial continues, with court due to reach a decision in late February.
