In brief
Justice Chandrachud, who concluded his term as India's chief justice last Sunday, previously articulated a deep reflection on his legacy just weeks ahead of retirement. As he faced uncertainties about his contributions and impact, the legal community and the public have sparked debates about his effectiveness and achievements during his period in office.
He served for over eight years on the Supreme Court, including two as chief justice, influencing the judiciary's role in a country of 1.4 billion people. Despite being hailed as a "celebrity judge" with significant advances in court digitization and making rulings that addressed fundamental rights, critiques of his assertiveness and accountability to those in power have emerged. His controversial moments, including perceived closeness to political figures and comments on sensitive social issues, raised questions about the judiciary's independence under his stewardship.Critics, including senior legal voices, express disappointment in his failure to challenge governmental authority effectively. While applauded for progressive rulings in areas such as LGBTQ rights and privacy, allegations surfaced that he often leaned toward governmental positions on contentious matters. As he steps down, the reflections on his service and the implications for future judicial leadership remain a topic of profound discussion within India's legal landscape.Justice Chandrachud underscored that while external perceptions vary, he believed he maintained his integrity and aimed to leave the judiciary in better health than when he assumed leadership.
